A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DESARDA'S REPAIR VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN'S MESHPLASTY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INGUINAL HERNIA
Introduction: Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed elective surgeries in surgical units around the world. Lichtenstein's tension-free meshplasty has long been regarded as the gold standard owing to its low recurrence rates. However, growing clinical experience has brought several late morbidity concerns with prosthetic mesh to light — including chronic groin pain, foreign body sensation, and rare but serious complications such as vas deferens injury and mesh infection. These concerns have revived interest in autologous tissue repairs. Desarda's technique, first reported in 2001, employs a pedicled strip of external oblique aponeurosis to dynamically buttress the posterior wall of the inguinal canal without synthetic material.Aims & Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes between Desarda repair and Lichtenstein mesh repair in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. Secondary outcomes assessed included postoperative pain, operative time, analgesic requirement, postoperative complications, and duration required for return to normal daily activities.Methods: A prospective, randomized, comparative study was carried out in the Department of Surgery at KMCRI, Hubballi. One hundred male patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomly divided into Group D (Desarda's repair, n=50) and Group L (Lichtenstein's meshplasty, n=50). Follow-up was conducted at 24 hours, 3 days, 5 days, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-surgery. The unpaired t-test was used for continuous data and the chi-square test for categorical data; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Desarda's repair recorded shorter mean operative duration (39.18 ± 3.32 vs. 49.98 ± 3.44 min; p < 0.001), reduced hospital stay (2.32 ± 0.55 vs. 3.64 ± 0.53 days; p < 0.001), and earlier return to occupational activity (15.56 ± 2.74 vs. 17.50 ± 1.91 days; p < 0.001). VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the Desarda arm at all six follow-up intervals (p < 0.001). Persistent groin pain at three months was noted in 6 (12%) Group D patients versus 10 (20%) in Group L (p = 0.413, NS). Complication rates were similar.Conclusion: Desarda's repair is a viable, safe, and economical tissue-based alternative to Lichtenstein's meshplasty, with advantages in operative speed, pain control, hospital stay, and return to work — all without foreign material. The technique merits wider adoption, especially for younger patients with indirect hernias and in resource-limited settings.