Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
67 Views
40 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 18 Issue 8 (AUGUST, 2026) | Pages 36 - 39
“Evaluating The Correct Technical Use Of Metered Dose Inhaler By Patients With Asthma And Copd : An Observational Study”
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor Department of pharmacology SNMC Bagalkote
2
Professor Dept of Respiratory Medicine SNMC, Bagalkote.
3
Professor Department Of Pharmacology SNMC Bagalkote.
4
MBBS III student SNMC , Bagalkote.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
March 3, 2026
Revised
April 15, 2026
Accepted
July 15, 2026
Published
Aug. 5, 2026
Abstract

Introduction: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common conditions among general population. The prevalence of asthma is 1% to 18% whereas COPD affects 6% of adult population. pressurized Metered dose inhalers[PMDI] are the most commonly used routes of drug administration in these patients .The proper technique of using the PMDI is vital for treatment. Its observed from different studies thst most patients use the technique wrong at multiple steps This study is done to evaluate the wrong techniques in using Pmdi seen in patients and correct it. Methodology: patients were asked to show their technique of using PMDI. WHO checklist was used to assess the technique.Any error at each step was noted. The data was analysed to see the percentage of participants doing it wrong. Afterwards patients were notified their error and correct technique was demonstrated. Results: 93% patients in our study group did error while using PMDI. Maximum error was done on steps involving  holding the breathe after pressing the canister, inhaling while at same time  pressing canister and noting /adjusting dose (step-8 ,2,9). Conclusion: study shows that there is significant number of patients use the PMDI by erong technique.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common conditions among general population. The prevalence of asthma is 1% to 18% whereas COPD affects 6% of adult population [1] They are two different diseases with differences in etiology, symptoms, type of inflammation, inflammatory cells, mediators, consequences of inflammation and response to therapy, course[2].one common factor in these obstructive diseases is the fact that the most vital part of  their treatment is the route of drug administered , which is inhalational route by Metered dose inhalers[MDI] . Pressurized metered dose inhaler [pMDI] is the one of the most used MDI.  MDI provide multiple advantages as financial affordability, convenience of use , portability, quickness, local action, and negligible systemic side effects and hence increases the adherence of the patient{3} which is very vital in treatment of chronic diseases like asthma &copd. Multiple studies have brought to light that error in the technique of using MDI has compromised all these advantages. For instance pMDI require slow, deep inhalation coordinated with actuation. It is essential for the dose to be released at the same time or very soon after the patient starts inhaling – not before. Any error in these, the medicine is more likely to be deposited in the oropharynx and fail to penetrate the airways {4}. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) both give significant prominence to assessing and correcting poor inhalation technique. both suggest to evaluate the technique before escalating drug therapy {5,6}. This study is done to evaluate the wrong techniques in using mdi seen in patients and correct it

 

considering the fact that MDI technique is not only a vital part of pharmacotherapy of the patient , but also it directly impacts adherence , quality of life & overall management of the diseases it is very crucial to assess the techniques the patient follows , correct it, thereby evaluating  the impact it has on the disease outcome\improvement . This will not only contribute to improve the management goals but also the long term improvement in the patient well being

 

Objectives; 1] To evaluate the technique of using pmdi in the patients using 12 steps utilization checklist by WHO {4}

                    2] Correction of the wrong technique by counseling & demonstration

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with asthma or COPD were included in the study. Inclusion criteria: patients above 18year with asthma or copd using pressurized metred dose inhaler as part of their treatment , willing to give consent and participate were included Exclusion criteria: patients having severe breathlessness and pregnant female’s were not included. Also patients with other respiratory illness using pMDI were excluded Written informed consent was taken from the patients with right to refuse the study. On first contact the patient will be given A placebo pMDI and asked to demonstrate how they use it. Each step in patient’s technique will be evaluated will WHO checklist with +1 for correct and 0 for wrong step. No interference will be done till the patient finishes. The patient will be now educated regarding their mistake. Counseling will include proper demonstration by taking above checklist as guideline and addressing any query the patient has. Statistical analysis: Sample size estimation was done using open epi software version 2.3.1.At 95% confidence level, and 80% power of the study the standard normal deviate for α = Zα = 1.960 .the standard normal deviate for β = Zβ = 0.84.According to the study conducted by Jolly GP {7).Proportion of Study subjects who knew proper usage of inhaler according to NIH expert panel 3 guideline at baseline =0.1%(p1).Proportion of Study subjects who knew proper usage of inhaler according to NIH expert panel 3 guideline after one intervention =23.7%(p2).Sample size estimated is 64, which is rounded off to 70. Formula used: n = (Zα/2+Zβ)2 * (p1(1-p1)+p2(1-p2)) / (p1-p2)2.

RESULTS

The step-wise assessment was done for all the 70patients for each of 12 steps of WHO checklist & percentage of error and correct technique was analyzed for each steps statistically.


(Table: FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Step1 Step2 Step3 Step4 Step5 Step6 Step7 Step8 Step9 Step10 Step11 Step12)

Steps

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Steps

 

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Step 1

Correct

70

100

100

100

           

Step 2

Correct

42

60

60

60

 

Error

28

40

40

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 3

Correct

70

100

100

100

           

Step 4

Correct

58

82.9

82.9

82.9

 

Error

12

17.1

17.1

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 5

Correct

50

71.4

71.4

71.4

 

Error

20

28.6

28.6

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 6

Correct

43

61.4

61.4

61.4

 

Error

27

38.6

38.6

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 7

Correct

64

91.4

91.4

91.4

 

Error

6

8.6

8.6

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 8

Correct

30

42.9

42.9

42.9

 

Error

40

57.1

57.1

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 9

Correct

43

61.4

61.4

61.4

 

Error

27

38.6

38.6

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 10

Correct

63

90

90

90

 

Error

7

10

10

100

 

Total

70

100

100

 
           

Step 11

Correct

70

100

100

100

           

Step 12

Correct

70

100

100

100

 

(Table : percentage of error in each step )

Steps number

Correct in percentage

Error in percentage

1

100

-

2

60

40

3

100

-

4

83

17

5

72

28

6

61.4

38.6

7

91

9

8

43

57

9

61.4

38.6

10

90

10

11

100

-

12

100

-

 

After analyzing the readings it was observed 94% patients did errors only 6% did all the steps correct. As seen from the table, in our study patients step-8 was with highest percentage of error (57%) followed by step-2 (40%) & step-6,9(38.6%). All the patients did steps-1, 3, 11&12 correctly

CONCLUSION

PMDI technique is not only a vital part of pharmacotherapy of the patient, but also it directly impacts adherence, quality of life & overall management of the diseases. It is very crucial to assess the techniques the patient follows, correct it, thereby evaluating the impact it has on the disease outcome\improvement. This will not only contribute to improve the management goals but also the long term improvement in the patient well being. Patient adherence, is likely to have an additional important impact on the control of symptoms in patients(11) Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)(5) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)(6) both give significant prominence to assessing and correcting poor inhalation technique. Both suggest evaluating the technique before escalating drug therapy. Keeping this in mind we assessed the above objectives. As it’s seen above those 94% patients do errors in the methods and only 6% use it with 100% correct technique. Many errors were made in vital steps like holding breathe, check the dose, co-ordination of slowly breathing & pressing the canister at same time , placing the mouth piece between teeth. It’s important to note that all the above errors are correctable and were corrected after counseling. Evidences from randomised clinical trials have shown that patients’ inhaler technique can be improved by education from a health care professional . The amount of instruction on inhaler technique given by health care professional’s influences patients’ likelihood of correct technique(8) Active measures should be taken to improve patients' basic knowledge regarding asthma diagnosis and inhaler technique. Apart from demonstrating complete steps of use of different inhalers, verbal guidance and visual demonstration in small groups or video tutorials should also be provided to improve measures(9) . this study also imphasises on the role of drug counseling in enhancing positive outcome of the disease. Acxknowledgement : We acknowledge Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences for funding this study

REFERENCES
  1.    Maheshwari P. Health related quality of life measurement in asthma and COPD. Res. J Pharm. Technol.2016; 9(5): 518-520.
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3633485/
  3. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway disease. Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro R, Pedersen S, Magnan A, Seidenberg J, Barnes PJ. Respir Med. 2008;102:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.031
  4. https://extranet.who.int/ncdccs/Data/AUS_D1_Inhaler_Technique_Infopaper-FULL-UPDATED-11-1.pdf
  5. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease: pocket guide to COPD diagnosis, management and prevention [http://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/wms-GOLD-2017-Pocket-Guide.pdf] Accessed: 26 May 2017.
  6. Global initiative for asthma: pocket guide for asthma management and prevention [http://ginasthma.org/2017-pocket-guide-for-asthma-management-and-prevention/] Accessed: 25 July 2017
  7. https://www.ijcdas.com/doi/pdf/10.5005/ijcdas-57-1-17
  8. Ganguly A, Das AK, Roy A, Adhikari A, Banerjee J, Sen S. Study of Proper use of Inhalational Devices by Bronchial Asthma or COPD Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):HC04-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9457.4976. Epub 2014 Oct 20. PMID: 25478367; PMCID: PMC4253185.
  9. https://www.ijrc.in/abstractArticleContentBrowse/IJRC/30896/JPJ/fu
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Association of Vitamin D Deficiency with Asthma Control and Exacerbation Frequency: A Cross-Sectional Study
...
Published: 05/08/2026
Original Article
A Cross- sectional Observational Study of Geriatric dermatoses in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Central India.
...
Published: 04/08/2026
Research Article
The Silent Epidemic: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
...
Published: 20/02/2025
Research Article
Frailty Unmasked: Sarcopenia in the Elderly Diabetic Population
Published: 18/04/2026
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine