Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
69 Views
20 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 18 Issue 6 (June, 2026) | Pages 739 - 744
Comparative Assessment of Pain, Recovery, and Patient Satisfaction After Laser Surgery for Grade IV Hemorrhoids
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, MTI, GOMAL Medical College, D.I.Khan,
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
May 27, 2026
Revised
June 10, 2026
Accepted
June 17, 2026
Published
June 30, 2026
Abstract

Background: Grade IV hemorrhoids are more likely to need surgery but traditional hemorrhoidectomy causes more pain and prolonged recovery. laser hemorrhoidoplastyhas proved itself to be a minimally invasive method that can enhance postoperative results. Objective: To assess postoperative pain, recovery, and patient satisfaction following laser surgery for Grade IV hemorrhoids. Methods: This was a comparative cross sectional study conducted in the Department of General Surgery, MTI, GOMAL Medical College, D.I.Khan from November 2025-April 2026. Patients with grade IV hemorrhoids who were treated by laser surgery were selected consecutively, a total of 95 patients were included. The VAS was used to record postoperative pain at 24 hours, postoperative day 3 and day 7. The outcome measures for the recovery consisted of hospital stay, normal activity, wound healing, and postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 month postoperatively, on a 5-point Likert scale. The data were analyzed by the IBM SPSS version 26.0 software program and the p-value of ≤0.05 was chosen as statistically significant.

Results: Pain significantly reduced with time (p<0.001) after surgery. The patients had a benign recovery, with a brief inpatient period and a rapid return to everyday life. There were few complications overall, and most reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the surgical outcome. The diabetes status was linked to longer hospital stays and the postoperative complications were significantly linked with delayed recovery and decreased patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Laser surgery is an effective method for early postoperative pain control, fast recovery, low complication rate, and high patient satisfaction, making it a safe minimally invasive treatment option for Grade IV hemorrhoids.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most prevalent anorectal conditions in the world, with an estimated prevalence of 4–5% in the general population and a significantly higher prevalence in adults aged 45–65 years.[1] It is caused by the abnormal enlargement and distal displacement of the normal anal vascular cushions, with clinical symptoms including prolapse, pain, bleeding, pruritus and discomfort, which have a marked impact on quality of life.[2] Grade IV hemorrhoids are the farthest advanced stage of the disease, and are permanently prolapsed so that it cannot be pushed back in manually and may need surgery.[3] Although the gold standard for treatment of advanced hemorrhoids is conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy, this procedure is often painful, the wound healing process takes a long time, patients are unable to return to their normal activities, and satisfaction rates are low.[4, 5] There has been growing interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques that can deliver similar clinical outcomes with reduced post-surgical morbidity.[6]

laser hemorrhoidoplastyis a novel minimally invasive technique that has become available for the management of advanced hemorrhoidal disease.[7] This method involves controlled laser energy to coagulate and shrink the hemorrhoidal tissue without harming the surrounding anoderm and sphincter complex.[8] Laser treatment has been reported to have less tissue trauma, less bleeding in the operating room, less operating time, less post-operative pain, and faster healing when compared to conventional excisional surgery.[9] Hemorrhoidal disease is considered a major reason for millions of outpatient consultations and surgical procedures worldwide every year.[10] Nearly 10–20% of symptomatic hemorrhoid sufferers require surgical interventions, especially among those with Grades III and IV.[11] In recent years, there has been growing evidence that laser-assisted procedures may allow for earlier mobilization and shorter hospital stays, as well as a quicker return to daily activities, which is why they are an appealing choice for both surgeons and patients who seek improved recovery after surgery.[12]

 

With the growing use of laser surgery for advanced hemorrhoidal disease, it is important to have a thorough evaluation of postoperative outcomes to assess the clinical efficacy and patient-centered benefits of this procedure. Comparative evaluation of pain intensity, recovery profile, and satisfaction level can offer evidence to inform the choice of surgery and the best possible treatment options for Grade IV hemorrhoids. Moreover, there is limited local data that support these outcomes in patients undergoing laser surgery, and more studies are needed to confirm these findings. Thus, the present study is designed to comparatively evaluate postoperative pain, recovery and satisfaction following laser surgery in grade IV hemorrhoids and to provide evidence that can help improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional comparative study was performed in the Department of General Surgery, MTI, GOMAL Medical College, D.I.Khan from November 2025-April 2026. The number of patients was calculated by software (OpenEpi version 3.01) for comparing two means based on previous study which reported the expected difference in mean postoperative pain scores of about 1.5 units with a pooled standard deviation of 2.5 units, a 95% confidence level, 80% study power, and equal allocation between groups, a minimum sample size of 90 participants (45 per group) was determined.[13] The sample size was increased by about 5% to compensate for the possibility of incomplete follow-up and missing data, giving a final sample size of 95 patients. Non-probability consecutive sampling technique was used to recruit patients. The study included patients ages 18–70 years of either gender with clinically confirmed Grade IV hemorrhoids undergoing laser hemorrhoid surgery and who signed an informed consent form.[14] Patients with recurrent hemorrhoids after previous surgery, patients with thrombosis of external hemorrhoids who required emergency surgery, patients who had inflammatory bowel disease or have colorectal malignancy, patients who had an anal fissure or fistula, or patients who were pregnant, had a bleeding disorder, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe systemic illness ‘ASA class IV or above’, or incomplete follow-up data were excluded from the study. Written informed consent was obtained before entry into the study, after Institutional Ethical Review Committee approval. Demographic and clinical data such as age, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms, presenting complaints, and associated comorbidities were obtained using a structured proforma. The surgical procedures were carried out by the experienced colorectal surgeons involved in this study, under spinal or general anesthesia, following the institutional protocol, and using a standardized laser hemorrhoid oplasty technique. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, was used to evaluate the postoperative pain at 24 hours, 3 days after surgery, and 7 days after surgery. Evaluation of recovery was done through length of hospital stay, time to recover to normal daily functioning, postoperative complications, and the outcome of wound healing during follow-up. A five-point Likert satisfaction scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) was used to assess patient satisfaction for the first month post-surgery.[15] The principal investigator recorded all information to make it uniform and to reduce the observer bias. The privacy of the participants was respected during this study. IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 was used to enter and analyze the data. Continuous variables such as age, BMI, postoperative pain scores, hospital stay and recovery time were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Qualitative data such as gender, presenting symptoms, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction categories were presented in frequencies and percentages. To test the normality of the continuous variables, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used. Comparisons between continuous variables were done by ‘an independent sample t-test’, and for categorical variables, the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. Results with a p-value of ≤ 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 95 patients who underwent laser hemorrhoid surgery for Grade IV hemorrhoids. The study population consisted of adult female and male patients with similar demographic and clinical data points at the start of the cohort. Most patients were presenting with bleeding per rectum, pain on defecation and prolapse, and almost half of the patients did not have associated comorbidities. The study population was representative of the patients who are typically treated surgically for advanced hemorrhoidal disease. (Table 1)

 

The outcomes of the operative surgery and early postoperative period were favorable in laser hemorrhoid surgery. Most patients had an uncomplicated recovery period, while there were some minor complications in a small number of patients. The procedure was minimally invasive as most participants had a short hospital stay, rapid recovery and satisfactory wound healing. (Table 2)

 

The pain score improved over time in the postoperative period, and there was significant reduction in pain during follow-up. The results of statistical analysis showed there to be a significant decrease in pain with time, indicating successful postoperative recovery following laser surgery. (Table 3)

 

The overall satisfaction levels were high, with the majority of patients having positive perceptions about the surgical outcome one month after surgery, with a few patients reporting dissatisfaction. (Table 4)

 

There was no gender difference in any postoperative pain or complication rate seen in the comparative analysis. Patients with diabetes, however, spent significantly longer in hospital and those who went on to develop postoperative complications spent longer to get back to normal daily activities. Furthermore, patient satisfaction was significantly associated with postoperative complications. (Table 5)

Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants (n = 95)

Variable

n (%) / Mean ± SD

Age (years)

46.8 ± 11.4

18–40 years

28 (29.5)

41–60 years

49 (51.6)

>60 years

18 (18.9)

Gender

 

Male

58 (61.1)

Female

37 (38.9)

BMI (kg/m²)

27.6 ± 3.8

Duration of symptoms (months)

18.4 ± 9.2

Presenting symptoms

 

Bleeding per rectum

87 (91.6)

Pain during defecation

81 (85.3)

Prolapse

95 (100.0)

Pruritus

42 (44.2)

Constipation

39 (41.1)

Comorbidities

 

Diabetes mellitus

17 (17.9)

Hypertension

24 (25.3)

Diabetes + Hypertension

9 (9.5)

None

45 (47.4)

 

Table 2. Operative characteristics, postoperative recovery and complications (n = 95)

Variable

Mean ± SD / n (%)

Operative time (minutes)

24.5 ± 5.8

Hospital stay (days)

1.3 ± 0.5

Return to normal activities (days)

7.8 ± 2.6

Complete wound healing (days)

21.7 ± 4.3

Complications

 

Postoperative bleeding

4 (4.2)

Urinary retention

6 (6.3)

Surgical site infection

2 (2.1)

Anal stenosis

0 (0.0)

Recurrence

1 (1.1)

No complication

82 (86.3)

 

Table 3. Postoperative pain assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (n = 95)

Assessment time

Mean ± SD

24 hours

4.8 ± 1.4

Postoperative Day 3

2.9 ± 1.2

Postoperative Day 7

1.1 ± 0.8

Friedman test

p-value: <0.001

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4. Patient satisfaction one month after laser surgery (n = 95)

Satisfaction level

n (%)

Very satisfied

49 (51.6)

Satisfied

34 (35.8)

Neutral

8 (8.4)

Dissatisfied

3 (3.2)

Very dissatisfied

1 (1.1)

 

Table 5. Association of postoperative outcomes with selected patient characteristics

Variable

Group

Mean ± SD / n (%)

p-value

24-hour VAS pain score

Male

4.6 ± 1.4

0.286

 

Female

5.0 ± 1.3

 

Hospital stay (days)

Diabetes

1.8 ± 0.7

0.018

 

No diabetes

1.2 ± 0.4

 

Return to normal activities (days)

Complications present

10.4 ± 2.3

<0.001

 

No complications

7.4 ± 2.1

 

Postoperative complications

Male

9 (15.5%)

0.507

 

Female

4 (10.8%)

 

Patient satisfaction

Complications present

8/13 satisfied

0.006

 

No complications

75/82 satisfied

 
DISCUSSION

The current study showed the positive short-term results after laser treatment for Grade IV hemorrhoids, which included a progressive decrease in postoperative pain, quick healing, a low complication rate, a short hospital stay, and high patient satisfaction. These results are in line with the increasing number of studies proving the effectiveness of laser hemorrhoidoplasty as a minimally invasive procedure for severe hemorrhoid disease. The dramatic reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores between postoperative day 1 and day 7 seen in the present study is consistent with the tissue-preserving mechanism of laser surgery, which is associated with a minimum of thermal destruction and postoperative inflammation.

 

The results of our study are consistent with the results of the randomized controlled trial conducted by Tuba Mert (2023) to compare laser hemorrhoidoplasty with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in patients having Grade III to Grade IV hemorrhoids. The authors found that significantly lower VAS pain scores and faster symptom resolution were achieved with laser surgery vs. traditional hemorrhoidectomy (p<0.001), and that laser surgery resulted in fewer postoperative complications, suggesting better postoperative pain than traditional hemorrhoidectomy. These results are very similar to our study, where we found a marked decrease in pain after surgery.[16]

 

In the same way, the systematic review and meta-analysis from 2023 showed that the laser hemorrhoidoplasty yielded significantly lower postoperative pain on postoperative day 1 and day 7, fewer analgesic uses, shorter operation time and earlier return to everyday activity when compared with the traditional hemorrhoidectomy. According to the review, laser surgery provides significant clinical benefits in the short term with an acceptable level of safety.[17] The results of the present study in pain reduction and faster healing time are consistent with these combined results.

 

The prospective non-randomized study published in 2024, which compared laser hemorrhoidoplasty, LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy, and diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, also corroborates our findings of quick postoperative recovery and short hospital stay. The investigators found that the laser hemorrhoidoplasty technique showed significantly shorter surgery times, quicker return to work, lower postoperative pain scores, higher quality-of-life scores, and better recovery. The patient satisfaction level was similar across treatment groups, but there were clear benefits for laser surgery in early postoperative recovery, as in the current study.[18]

 

The prospective study about postoperative results and predictive factors after laser hemorrhoidoplasty further confirms the favorable recovery profile that we observed in our patients. That study found that there was little post-operative pain, low complication rates, and that patients were able to recover quickly, with quality of life being significantly improved after undergoing laser treatment. Additionally, the severity of the disease (based on grade) was found to be an independent predictor of pain and longer recovery among patients; this indicated the significance of the grade of the disease in postoperative outcome. However, with advanced hemorrhoids, our research also showed excellent recovery results from laser surgery.[19]

 

The low number of postoperative complications in our study aligns with the results of the retrospective study published in Scientific Reports in 2025 that showed low postoperative complications following ‘laser hemorrhoidoplasty and excisional hemorrhoidectomy’ for Grade IV hemorrhoids. The authors noted less postoperative pain, less urinary retention, satisfactory patient-reported outcomes and acceptable complication rates when compared to LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. As expected, their findings validate the safety of laser surgery for severe hemorrhoid cases.[20]

 

The high satisfaction level that was found in the present study also backs up the 2026 retrospective cohort study that looked at the 2-year outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty. Patients were highly satisfied, postoperative pain was mild, hospital stay was generally one day and most patients were able to return to their normal activities within the first week after their operation. Our follow-up period was shorter, but our results show that patients were similarly satisfied following laser surgery.[21]

 

In conclusion, the results of the present study were similar to the current evidence revealing that laser surgery for Grade IV hemorrhoids results in significantly less postoperative pain, faster healing, lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and higher patient satisfaction. The results of the study provide further support for the growing use of laser hemorrhoidoplasty as a less radical surgical procedure when compared with traditional hemorrhoidectomy and the need for larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up to determine the long-term recurrence and durability of the procedure.

 

There were a number of limitations to this study. First, it was carried out in one institution, with a small sample of just 39 patients, which can make it difficult to generalize the results. Second, this follow-up period was brief, and the follow-up data were mostly early postoperative results, leaving out the possibility of determining the rate of recurrence or how satisfied patients were with the results in the long run. Third, there was no control group with a traditional hemorrhoidectomy available to compare the relative effectiveness of laser surgery. Lastly, patient satisfaction and pain assessment focused on subjective reporting and may have resulted in a response bias despite the use of validated assessment tools.

CONCLUSION

The early postoperative results of laser surgery for Grade IV hemorrhoids showed improved and progressive decrease in pain, rapid recovery, short hospital stay, low complications and high patient satisfaction. The results showed that laser hemorrhoidoplasty is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease. The results of this study should be confirmed with larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up to determine long-term recurrence and functional results.

REFERENCES
  1. Sheikh, P., et al., The prevalence, characteristics and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: results of an international web-based survey. Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2020. 9(17): p. 1219-1232.
  2. Ramraj, D., A Prospective Study of Post Operative Complicatons and its Management Following Open Hemorrhoidectomy. 2015, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India).
  3. Wang, L., et al., Time to change? Present and prospects of hemorrhoidal classification. Frontiers in Medicine, 2023. 10: p. 1252468.
  4. Kang, S.I., Latest research trends on the management of hemorrhoids. Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. 9(2): p. 179-191.
  5. Lohsiriwat, V. and R. Jitmungngan, Strategies to reduce post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a systematic review. Medicina, 2022. 58(3): p. 418.
  6. Drossopoulos, P.N., et al., Pushing the limits of minimally invasive spine surgery—from preoperative to intraoperative to postoperative management. Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. 13(8): p. 2410.
  7. di Schiano di Visconte, M., Laser hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, outcomes and future directions. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2025. 95(11): p. 2301-2305.
  8. Surya, D. and P. Gharde, Precision and power: A comprehensive review of exploring the role of laser treatment in hemorrhoidal management. Cureus, 2024. 16(5).
  9. Lakmal, K., et al., Clinical outcomes and effectiveness of laser treatment for hemorrhoids: a systematic review. World Journal of Surgery, 2021. 45(4): p. 1222-1236.
  10. Ashburn, J.H., Hemorrhoidal disease: a review. JAMA, 2025. 334(17): p. 1541-1550.
  11. Qureshi, W., et al., AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Expert Review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2026.
  12. Alves, G.A.M., et al., laser hemorrhoidoplastyversus LigaSure Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade II–III Hemorrhoids: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Open, 2026: p. 100020.
  13. Laigaard, J., et al., Perioperative analgesic interventions for reduction of persistent postsurgical pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2025. 141(4): p. 765-778.
  14. Miyamoto, H., Minimally invasive treatment for advanced hemorrhoids. Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2023. 7(1): p. 8-16.
  15. Alabi, A.T. and M.O. Jelili, Clarifying likert scale misconceptions for improved application in urban studies. Quality & Quantity, 2023. 57(2): p. 1337-1350.
  16. Mert, T., Comparison of laser haemorrhoidoplasty and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy in treating grade III and grade IV haemorrhoids: a prospective randomised study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2023. 33(1): p. 41-6.
  17. Wee, I.J.Y., et al., laser hemorrhoidoplastyversus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Coloproctology, 2023. 39(1): p. 3.
  18. Khadr, M.A., et al., laser hemorrhoidoplastyversus LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids: a non-randomized prospective trial. Surgery Open Digestive Advance, 2024. 13: p. 100129.
  19. Barbu, L.A., et al., Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Postoperative Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Pain, Bleeding, and Recovery. Life, 2025. 15(11): p. 1777.
  20. Liao, Y.-T., et al., Short-term and patient-reported outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplastyplus excisional hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 41510.
  21. Elhardello, O., et al., Laser hemorrhoidoplasty: two-year outcomes from a retrospective observational cohort study. Lasers in Medical Science, 2026. 41(1): p. 126.

 

 

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
AI-Enhanced CBCT-Based Anatomical Mapping for Precision Biomaterial Selection in Dental Implant Success
...
Published: 30/06/2026
Research Article
“Prevalence and Determinants of Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study”
Published: 18/05/2026
Original Article
Efficacy of Ondansetron versus Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.
Published: 02/06/2025
Research Article
Evaluation of Gallstone Disease Patterns and Operative Findings in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study
...
Published: 12/12/2023
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine