Endodontic emergencies are common in dental practice, often presenting with severe pain, swelling, or infection that requires immediate intervention. Some emergencies include irreversible pulpitis, acute apical abscesses, and traumatic dental injuries many of which are common reasons for patients to seek emergent care [1]. All these instances require an efficient and timely intervention to address the discomfort, infection control and recognition of complications. In case the endodontic problems are not treated early they tend to become much worse and may cause the patient to develop systemic infections and other health complications [2]. Consequently, the knowledge of relevant practices and approaches toward management of these emergent conditions is vital in clinical practice. In order to manage endodontic emergencies, the first thing that need to be done is to diagnose the problem precisely [3]. Spontaneous and heat associated pulpitis is irreversible in nature and caused by deep caries or trauma. Acute apical abscesses have manifestations with localized swelling and pain over the root apex with formation of pus collection, sometimes with or without general signs such as fever. Sometimes the fracture or avulsion can also include the pulp or the surrounding structures which require treatment [4,5]. Understanding of aetiology of pathologies enables proper differential diagnosis between pulpal and periapical pathology through means of a clinical examination and radiography to guarantee the correct choice of the treatment strategy. Alleviation of pain is always on the agenda when dealing with endodontic emergencies and a cocktail of pharmacological and interventional options is usually informed to the patient [6]. A list of medicines which are being used to control inflammation and pain include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs – for instance, ibuprofen [7]. In extreme cases only opioids can be used and this is done sparingly because of side effects and dependency. Local anaesthesia is also important for the management of pain during treatment since there are the nerve blocks, intra-ligamentary and intra osseous drugs which provide profound anesthesia [8]. The inter Pohar irreversible pulpitis can be resolved by various forms of intervention specifically, pulpotomy- removal of the inflamed pulp tissue within the tooth or pulpectomy -removal of both the inflamed pulp tissue and the root canal providing relief by alleviating pressure within the tooth [9]. In the case of abscesses, infection may become apparent and, therefore, antibiotics may be required in patients who have signs of generalized infection. Nevertheless, antibiotics in isolation cannot solve the dental problem and one has to seek definitive treatments such as drainage or root canal treatment [10,11].  In some instances, the abscess may cause pressure on the tissues, and, therefore, surgical incision and drainage may be required and the individual will then require antibiotics [12]. Examples of antibiotics used are Penicillin or Amoxicillin but the doctor usually prescribes the type with regard to the severity of the infection and other relevant factors of the patient [13]

Objectives

The main objective of the study is to find the effective strategies for the management of endodontic emergencies in clinical practice.

Care Dental Hospital during May 2025 and November 2025. Data were collected from 165 patients through a systematically designed questionnaire. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, which was administered to patients during their visit to a dental clinic. The questionnaire included sections covering demographic information, the nature of the endodontic emergency, prior dental history, symptoms, and pain levels. Patients to be having signs of endodontic emergencies, severe pain, swelling or infection were included in the study. Children below 18 years of age, pregnant women and clients who suffer from illnesses that may have an effect on their teeth were not included in the study. Each of the participants was read and understood the study objectives, and consent was sought from each of them. The questionnaire specifically questioned the type of emergency (for example irreversible pulpitis, acute apical abscess, traumatic injury); the duration and severity of the symptoms; any previous treatment that was carried out and any medication. Further, before and after the treatment, the patients were self-administered a pain scale that they used to give their rating of their pain. This was helpful to the researchers as it enabled them to determine the early effects of different management approaches. The clinical team also employed this information together with clinical and radiographic assessments to manage the PV patients, in terms of pulpotomy or vital root treatment, endodontic intervention, or extraction. Data collected from the questionnaire were analyzed using SPSS v29. Descriptive statistics to identify common trends in the presentation and management of endodontic emergencies, as well as the effectiveness of treatments in providing immediate relief from symptoms

Data were collected from 165 patients with 56% being male and 44% female. The majority of patients (41%) were between 31-45 years old, followed by 27% aged 18-30, 24% aged 46-60, and 8% aged 61 and above. Most patients (79%) had no relevant medical history, while 21% reported systemic conditions such as diabetes or hypertension.

Table 1: Demographic data of patients

Patients with irreversible pulpitis had an average pre-treatment pain score of 8.7, which decreased to 2.1 after treatment. Those with acute apical abscesses experienced a reduction from 8.4 to 1.8, while patients with traumatic dental injuries saw a drop from 7.9 to 2.5. Overall, the average pain score for all conditions decreased from 8.5 to 2.1, indicating the effectiveness of the treatment strategies used in managing endodontic emergencies.

Table 2: Pain Levels Pre- and Post-Treatment

Pulpotomy being the most common, performed on 42% of patients, resulting in an 85% success rate in pain relief. Root canal therapy was administered to 36% of patients, showing a high success rate of 95%. Incision and drainage were used for 18% of patients, achieving 80% successful pain relief, while 3% of patients underwent tooth extraction, with 100% reporting pain resolution

Table 3: Treatment Types and Outcomes

88% (145 patients) reporting they were highly satisfied with their emergency treatment. Additionally, 80% (132 patients) successfully completed their follow-up treatment, while 20% (33 patients) either delayed or did not complete their recommended treatment.

Table 4: Patient Satisfaction and Follow-Up Completion

Patients with irreversible pulpitis experienced a decrease in pain from 8.7 to 2.1, with a p-value of 0.001. For those with acute apical abscesses, pain dropped from 8.4 to 1.8 (p = 0.002), and for traumatic dental injuries, the reduction was from 7.9 to 2.5 (p = 0.003). The overall average pain reduction across all conditions was from 8.5 to 2.1, with a highly significant p-value of 0.001. These p-values confirm the statistical significance of the pain relief observed post-treatment.

Table 5: Statistical Significance of Pain Reduction (Pre- vs. Post-Treatment)

The results of this cross-sectional study provide valuable insights into the effective management of endodontic emergencies in clinical practice. Pulpotomy, root canal therapy, as well as incision and drainage were shown to be effective in the immediate management of acute conditions because the patients reported improvement of their pain levels in all the conditions mentioned above [14-16]. Distribution of endodontic emergencies showed that the most common condition was irreversible pulpitis in 60% of the patients while acute apical abscesses taken by 25% and the third category being the traumatic dental injury in 15% of the patients. These findings echo what has been stated in previous studies concluding that pulpitis has been confirmed quantitatively as the leading cause of endodontic pain [17] . Irreversible pulpitis is seen to be very common and patients with this condition should seek early treatment; this shows the need to have regular dental check ups[18]. Sending became another factor in this study; the average pain score decreased from 8.5 pre-treatment to 2.1 post-treatment. There are probably two reasons for the effectiveness of these procedures: Firstly, these procedures have the effect of thrombosis in the root canals, and secondly, they enable the extraction of inflamed and infected pulp tissue, which is the source of the pain [19-21]. Incision and drainage in the management of acute apical abscesses which is a very significant procedure demonstrated effectiveness as well, hence an 80% success rate in managing the symptoms. It is however important to note the fact that drainage relieves current pressure and pain but entails definitive treatment (e. g. root canal therapy) to be applied in order to stop recurrent episodes [22] . In this study antibiotics were administered along with surgical drainage especially where there is systematic implication which is in consonance with tooth infection management. The survey also found high level of patients’ satisfaction since most of the respondents, eighty-eight percent of them, expressed satisfaction with the emergency treatment they received. It is very important for the patients follow up and to ensure that they come for their check-ups and follow up consultations[23]. The possible reasons could be the financial issues or personal problems; it can also be hypothesized that follow-up non-adherence requires clinicians to pay more attention to the patient’s financial Literacy level and counsel patients more on the financial readiness to attend follow-up appointments [24-26]. One of the major sources of bias in this study is the lack of follow up as adopted in cross-sectional study thereby informing a cross-sectional treatment success; a study with no provision for long-term success or relapse of the endodontic problems [27]. Subsequent research can use longitudinal design to capture patient outcomes in the longer run hence giving more information on how various treatment approaches work in the long-term [28].,

It is concluded that timely and effective management of endodontic emergencies, including procedures such as pulpotomy, root canal therapy, and incision and drainage, significantly reduces pain and improves patient outcomes. The study highlights high success rates and patient satisfaction with these treatments, though further emphasis on patient education and follow-up care is essential to ensure long-term success and prevent recurrence of symptoms

1. Chen, Y., Yang, K. and Marušić, A., 2017. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Ann Intern Med, 166, pp.128–132.
2. Verma, N., Sangwan, P., Tewari, S. and Duhan, J., 2019. Effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on outcome of primary root canal treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod, 45, pp.357–363.
3. Adhanom, T., 2020. WHO Director-General's remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-2019-ncov-on-11-february-2020 [Accessed 3 May 2020].
4. American Dental Association, 2020. ProMD health guidance for minimizing risk while treating patients during and after COVID-19. ProMD Health. Available at: https://promdhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ProMD-COVID-Risk-Mitigation-Guidelines-v2-5-1-2020-2.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2020].
5. Alharbi, A., Alharbi, S. and Alqaidi, S., 2020. Guidelines for dental care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saudi Dent J, 32, pp.181–186.
6. Caprioglio, A., Pizzetti, G.B. and Zecca, P.A., 2020. Management of orthodontic emergencies during 2019-NCOV. Prog Orthod, 21, p.10.
7. Chang, D., Xu, H. and Rebaza, A., 2020. Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med, 8, p.e13.
8. Chan, J.F., Yuan, S. and Kok, K.H., 2020. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet, 395, pp.514–523.
9. Cochrane Oral Health, 2020. Recommendations for the re-opening of dental services: a rapid review of international sources. Cochrane Oral Health. Available at: https://oralhealth.cochrane.org/sites/oralhealth.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/covid19_dental_review_16_may_2020_update.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2020].
10. Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S. and Steinmann, E., 2020. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect, 104, pp.246–251.
11. Li, Q., Guan, X. and Wu, P., 2020. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med, 382, pp.1199–1207.
12. Meng, L., Hua, F. and Bian, Z., 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res, 99, pp.481–487.
13. Ong, S.W., Tan, Y.K. and Chia, P.Y., 2020. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA, 323, pp.1610–1612.
14. Parhar, H.S., Tasche, K. and Brody, R.M., 2020. Topical preparations to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosolization in head and neck mucosal surgery. Head Neck, 42, pp.1268–1272.
15. Peng, X., Xu, X. and Li, Y., 2020. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci, 12, pp.1–6.
16. Prati, C., Pelliccioni, G.A. and Sambri, V., 2020. COVID-19: its impact on dental schools in Italy, clinical problems in endodontic therapy and general considerations. Int Endod J, 53, pp.723–725.
17. Rothe, C., Schunk, M. and Sothmann, P., 2020. Transmission of 2019-NCOV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med, 382, pp.970–971.
18. Sabino-Silva, R., Jardim, A.C. and Siqueira, W.L., 2020. Coronavirus COVID-19 impacts to dentistry and potential salivary diagnosis. Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.1619–1621.
19. Van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T. and Morris, D., 2020. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med, 382, pp.1564–1567.
20. Vergara-Buenaventura, A. and Castro-Ruiz, C., 2020. The use of mouthwashes against COVID-19 in dentistry. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58, pp.924–927.
21. Versaci, M.B., 2020. ADA releases interim guidance on minimizing COVID-19 transmission risk when treating dental emergencies. Am Dent Assoc News, 51, pp.1–15.
22. Walton, R.E. and Keiser, K., 2008. Endodontic emergencies and therapeutics. In: M. Torabinejad and R.E. Walton, eds. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier, pp.148–162.
23. Yu, J., Zhang, T. and Zhao, D., 2020. Characteristics of endodontic emergencies during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Wuhan. J Endod, 46, pp.730–735.
24. Silva, W. O., Vianna Silva Macedo, R. P., Nevares, G., Val Rodrigues, R. C., Grossi Heleno, J. F., Braga Pintor, A. V., & Almeida, B. M. (2020). Recommendations for Managing Endodontic Emergencies during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak. Journal of Endodontics, 47(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.018
25. Falatah AM, Almalki RS, Al-Qahtani AS, Aljumaah BO, Almihdar WK, Almutairi AS. Comprehensive Strategies in Endodontic Pain Management: An Integrative Narrative Review. Cureus. 2023 Dec 12;15(12):e50371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50371. PMID: 38213339; PMCID: PMC10782221.
26. Schuh, C.M., Benso, B. and Aguayo, S., 2019. Potential novel strategies for the treatment of dental pulp-derived pain: pharmacological approaches and beyond. Front Pharmacol, 10, p.1068.
27. Sumidarti, A. and Dwiandhany, W.S., 2017. Management pain and anxiety in endodontic treatment. J Dentomaxillofac Sci, 2, pp.4–6.
28. Jenarthanan, S. and Subbarao, C., 2018. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of diclofenac sodium administered using different delivery routes in the management of endodontic pain: A randomized controlle J Conserv Dent, 21, pp.297–301