Implantation of prosthetic mesh in repair of different hernias has gained a global acceptance and popularity. It is thought to be a potent safeguard against recurrence of hernias 1, 2.

The use of prosthetic mesh in different types of hernias has brought a phenomenal change in the outlook of hernia patients all over the world 3. Today, an ever-increasing number of hernias are repaired by implanting prosthetic meshes either by conventional open method or by laparoscopic approach 4.

Besides its well-known advantages and global acceptance in every day hernia surgery, a number of complications are thought to be associated with the use of mesh in different types of hernias 5- 15 We present our experience of mesh related complications in different open hernia repairs and their management in this study.

It’s a descriptive observational study over 5 years during which a total number of 1008 patients with different types of hernias were repaired electively in a teaching hospital as well as in private hospitals by the same surgical team. Of these, 638 (63.29 %) hernias were repaired by implanting prolene mesh of different sizes depending on the size of the defect. A drain was left in place in selected cases. The patients were followed up to a period of three years after discharge from the hospital. The follow up visits were scheduled at 1 month, 6 months, and then yearly. Of the total patients , 432(67.71%) were followed up to three years while 159 (26%) patients were lost in the follow up from day of discharge from the hospital. Another 47 patients attended follow up up to 2 years only and then disappeared. Sixteen of these patients continued to complain about chronic pain and foreign body sensation up to two years and then they did not return while 4 of these patients developed recurrent hernia in one year time but they were lost in follow up.

The data of every patient is recorded on a proforma and their follow up records are maintained. The variables studied included immediate, early and late post-operative complications in addition to the demographic details. The statistical analysis of the data is done on SPSS version 12.

The mean age of the patients is 41 years with a range of 73 years and a STD of 19.089. There is a male dominance (N=531, 83%) over females (N=107, 17 %). The commonest type of hernia in this series is inguinal hernia (n=518, 81%) followed by Para-umbilical hernia (n=83, 13 %). Distribution of different varieties of hernias among male and female study population is shown in Table-I.

Table-1. Frequency of hernias and distribution among males and females

Of the total number, 34 (5 %) hernias were recurrent hernias including 21 inguinal hernias, 11 Para-umbilical hernias and 2 Incisional hernias. The patients were operated after preliminary investigations and medical fitness. All the patients were operated by open conventional technique regardless of the type of hernia. Total duration of operation is shown in Figure -I with maximum patients (467, 73%) operated within 60 minutes.

Table-II Type of hernia * Complications during same hospitalization Cross tabulation

Table-III Type of hernia * Late Complications after discharge Cross tabulation

Figure-I.   Total duration of operation:

Various early complications during the same admission occurred in 9 % (n=55) of the patients. Their distribution according to the type of hernia is displayed in Table- II.

Wound infection has an alarmingly high incidence in our series (n=19, 3 %). Most of these infections are superficial and effectively controlled by intensive antibiotic therapy so that the failure of repair is saved and mesh rejection prevented effectively. Four of recurrences occurred during 2 years follow up but patient discontinued follow up afterwards. Remaining 07 recurrences occurred between 24 to 36 weeks. The complications observed during the follow up period of up to three years in different hernias are shown in Table-III.

A remarkably low incidence of wound infection in para- umbilical and incisional hernia is attributable to the placement of suction drain which prevents hematoma formation and secondary infection. Seven (2%) recurrences occurred in para- umbilical hernias where suction drain did not work. Mesh infection with massive reaction, although, treated conservatively in 5 patients with vigorous antibiotic therapy led to the formation of a weaker scar which later on gave way and recurrence of hernia occurred. Follow up was not 100% and about 26% patients were lost in the follow up. Majority of the patients (n=457, 90 %) were discharged within 4 days while patients who were complicated had a longer stay up to 15 days (P <0.001). Late complications were mostly chronic pain and foreign body sensations with 2 cases of unilateral testicular atrophy.

are attributed to the use of mesh in the repair of most of the hernias5, 13, 16. The type of mesh as well as their composition seems to affect complications following their use and specific materials are related to specific complications. We present 638 patients of different types of hernias repaired by implanting polypropylene mesh of varying sizes depending upon the size of defect. Prolene meshes are monofilaments, non-absorbable, inert, sterile and porous synthetic materials commonly used for this purpose. The use of mesh in hernia repair has brought a phenomenal change in the overall outcome of hernia repair especially in terms of recurrence of hernia 17. We experienced wound infection as the commonest complication in our series (n=19, 3%) and this was more so in the inguinal hernias. Most of the wound infections are superficial and very easy to control on conservative measures. On the contrary deep seated mesh infections are always dreaded complications and if not treated vigorously can lead to total failure and rejection of prosthetic mesh. A number of similar studies have reported an increased infection rate in mesh hernia repair testifying our results 18-28. Grant AM 29, however claims no difference in the incidence of infection between mesh and non-mesh repair of groin hernias. A severe local reaction occurred in 4 (0.62%) patients which resolved in few days without any consequences. Seroma and hematoma occurred in 11(2 %) and 7(1.09%) patients respectively. Only 3 seromas and one hematoma needed evacuation. We report a recurrence of 11(2 %) hernias of which 4 are inguinal and 7 are para-umbilical hernias. All of the recurrent para-umbilical hernias had severe reaction and wound infection in the post-operative period which was effectively controlled by vigorous antibiotic therapy and local wound care. There is probably a weaker scar after resolution of the infective process which resulted in recurrence. A significantly low recurrence rate in inguinal hernias in our study (0.77%) is consistent with the results of other similar reports 30-32. Chronic pain and a foreign body sensation poses a real problem and though it occurred in only two cases but a similar study by Bay- Nielsen M 33 claims 22.9% study population having chronic pain and more so in the adult males.

Although mesh repair is an efficient method of hernia repair, a number of complications may be associated and can lead to failure. An aggressive antibiotic therapy and wound care may control even massive infections.

Competing Interests: None Declared

1. Sanjay, P., Reid, T. D., Davies, E. L., Arumugam, P. J., and Woodward, A. "Retrospective Comparison of Mesh and Suture Repair for Adult Umbilical Hernias." Hernia, vol. 9, no. 3, 2005, pp. 248-251.
2. Cobb, W. S., Kerchief, K. W., and Heniford, B. T. "The Argument for Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh in Hernia Repair." Surgical Innovation, vol. 12, no. 1, 2005, pp. 63-69.
3. DeBord, J. R. "The Historical Development of Prosthetics in Hernia Surgery." Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 78, 1998, pp. 973-1006.
4. Liem, M. S. L., Van Der Graaf, Y., Van Steensel, C. J., et al. "Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal Hernia Repair." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, 1997, pp. 1541-1547. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199705013361103
5. Bliziotis, I. A., Kasiakou, S. K., Kapaskelis, A. M., and Falagas, M. E. "Mesh-Related Infection After Hernia Repair: Case Report of an Emerging Type of Foreign-Body Related Infection." Infection, vol. 34, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1.
6. Chowbey, P. K., Bagchi, N., Goel, A., Sharma, A., Khullar, R., Sonni, V., and Baijal, M. "Mesh Migration into the Bladder After TEP Repair: A Rare Case Report." Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 16, no. 5, 2006, pp. 377-378.
7. Delikoukos, S., Tzovaras, G., Liakou, P., Mantzos, F., and Hatzetheofilou, C. "Late-Onset Deep Mesh Infection After Inguinal Hernia Repair." Hernia, vol. 11, no. 1, 2007, pp. 15-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-006-0171-4
8. Hoefkens, M. F., and Vles, W. J. "A Giant Pseudocyst Following Repair of an Incisional Hernia by a Polypropylene Mesh." Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 152, no. 4, 2008, pp. 216-220.
9. Celdran, A., Esteban, J., Manas, J., and Grazino, J. J. "Wound Infections Due to Mycobacterium fortuitum After Polypropylene Mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair." Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 66, no. 4, 2007, pp. 374-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.02.010
10. Singh-Ranger, D., Taneja, T., Sroden, P., and Peters, J. "A Rare Complication Following Laparoscopic TEP Repair: Case Report and Discussion of Literature." Hernia, vol. 11, no. 5, 2007, pp. 453-456. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0247-1
11. Bendavid, R. "Complications of Groin Hernia Surgery." Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 78, 1998, pp. 1089-1103
12. Robinson, T. N., Clarke, J. H., Schoen, J., and Walsh, M. D. "Major Mesh-Related Complications Following Hernia Repair: Events Reported to the Food and Drug Administration." Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 19, no. 12, 2005, pp. 1556-1560. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0303-1
13. White, T. J., Santos, M. C., and Thompson, J. S. "Factors Affecting Wound Complications Repair of Ventral Hernias." American Surgeon, vol. 64, no. 3, 1998, pp. 276-280.
14. Sohail, M. R., and Smilac, J. D. "Hernia Repair Mesh-Associated Mycobacterium goodie" Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 6, 2004, pp. 2858-2860. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2858-2860.2004
15. Delikoukos, S., Fafoulakis, F., Christodoulidis, G., Theodoropoulos, T., and Hatzitheofilou, C. "Re-Operation Due to Severe Late-Onset Persisting Groin Pain Following Anterior Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh." Hernia, vol. 12, 2008, [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0375-8
16. Leber, G. E., Grab, J. L., Alexander, A. I., and Reed, W. P. "Long-Term Complications Associated with Prosthetic Repair of Incisional Hernias." Archives of Surgery, vol. 133, no. 4, 1998, pp. 378-382. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378
17. Ove, H., and Kumar, A. "Complications of Incisional Hernia Repair: Delaminated Mesh with Incarcerated Hernia." ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 74, 2004, pp. 705-706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.03035.x
18. Furtschegger, A., Sandbichler, P., Judmaier, W., Gstir, H., Steiner, E., and Egender, G. "Sonography in the Post-Operative Evaluation of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair." Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 14, 1995, pp. 679-684. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1995.14.9.679
19. Stoppa, R. E. "The Treatment of Complicated Groin and Incisional Hernias." World Journal of Surgery, vol. 13, no. 5, 1989, pp. 545-554. DOI: 10.1007/BF01658137
20. Lujendijk, R. W., Hop, W. C., van den Tol, M. P., de Lange, D. C., Braaksma, M. M., Ijzermans, J. N., et al. "A Comparison of Suture Repair with Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 6, 2000, pp. 392-398. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430602
21. Cappelletti, M., Attolini, G., Cangioni, G., Mascherini, G., Taddeucci, S., and Gervino, L. "The Use of Mesh in Abdominal Wall Defects." Minerva Chirurgica, vol. 52, no. 10, 1999, pp. 1169-1176
22. Van’t Riet, M., de Vos van Steenwijk, P. J., Bonger, H. J., Steyerberg, E. W., and Jeekel, J. "Mesh Repair for Post-Operative Wound Dehiscence in the Presence of Infection: Is Absorbable Mesh Safer than Non-Absorbable Mesh?" Hernia, vol. 11, no. 5, 2007, pp. 409-413. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0262-2
23. Falagas, M. E., and Kasiakou, S. K. "Mesh-Related Infections After Hernia Repair Surgery." Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 11, no. 1, 2004, pp. 3-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1198-743X.2004.00865.x
24. Yerdel, M. A., Akin, E. B., Dolalan, S., Turkcapar, A. G., et al. "Effect of Single Dose Prophylactic Ampicillin and Sulbactam on Wound Infection After Tension-Free Inguinal Repair with Polypropylene Mesh: The Randomized Double-Blind, Prospective Trials." Annals of Surgery, vol. 233, no. 1, 2001, pp. 26-33. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00005
25. Geoffrey, E., Leber, J. L., Garb, A., and Reed, W. P. "Long-Term Complications Associated with Prosthetic Repair of Incisional Hernias." Archives of Surgery, vol. 133, 1998, pp. 378-382. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378
26. Farrow, B., Awad, S. S., Berger, D. H., Albo, D., Lee, L., Subramanian, A., and Bellows, C. F. "More than 150 Consecutive Open Umbilical Hernia Repairs in a Major Veteran Administration Medical Center." American Journal of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 5, 2008, pp. 647-651. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.05.023
27. Cingi, A., Manukyan, M. N., Gulluoglu, B. M., Barlas, A., Yegen, C., Yalin, R., Yilmaz, N., and Aktan, A. O. "Use of Resterilized Polypropylene Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective, Randomized Study." Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 201, no. 6, 2005, pp. 834-840. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.015
28. Terzi, C., Kilic, D., Unek, T., Hosgorler, F., Fuzun, M., and Ergor, G. "Single-Dose Oral Ciprofloxacin Compared with Single-Dose Intravenous Cefazolin for Prophylaxis in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Controlled Randomized Clinical Study." Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 60, no. 4, 2005, pp. 340-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.04.018
29. Grant, A. M. "Open Mesh Versus Non-Mesh Repair of Groin Hernia: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Based on Individual Patient Data [Corrected]." Hernia, vol. 6, no. 3, 2002, pp. 130-136. DOI: 10.1007/s100290200034
30. Kurzer, M., Belsham, P. A., and Kark, A. E. "The Lichtenstein Repair." Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 78, 1998, pp. 1025-1046.
31. Amid, P. K., Shulman, A. G., and Lichtenstein, I. L. "Simultaneous Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernias Under Local Anesthesia." Annals of Surgery, vol. 223, 1996, pp. 249-252. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00012
32. Scott, N. W., McCormack, K., Graham, P., Go, P. M., Ross, S. J., and Grant, A. M. "Open Mesh Versus Non-Mesh for Repair of Femoral and Inguinal Hernia." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, 2002, CD002197. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197
33. Bay-Nielsen, M., Nilsson, E., Nordin, P., and Kehlet, H. "Chronic Pain After Open Mesh and Sutured Repair of Indirect Inguinal Hernia in Young Males." British Journal of Surgery, vol. 91, 2004, pp. 1372-1376. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4530