Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
59 Views
21 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 18 Issue 2 (February, 2026) | Pages 277 - 281
Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Incidence, Predictors, and Impact on Clinical Outcomes
 ,
 ,
1
MD, DM, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India (swati21parida@gmail.com)
2
MD, DM, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India (om691987@gmail.com)
3
MD, DM, Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, IMS SUM hospital campus-2, Phulnakhara, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India (sabya.pattanayak4@gmail.com)
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 14, 2026
Revised
Jan. 28, 2026
Accepted
Feb. 4, 2026
Published
Feb. 12, 2026
Abstract

Introduction: Post-stroke dysphagia is a common complication of acute stroke and has been associated with higher rates of morbidity, aspiration pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and mortality. Early identification of dysphagia is essential to improve patient outcomes. Objective:
To determine the incidence of post-stroke dysphagia, identify its predictors, and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes among acute stroke patients.  Methods:

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 445 patients with acute stroke admitted to a tertiary care hospital were enrolled. Dysphagia was assessed within 48 hours of admission using the standardized Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) bedside swallowing test. Data on demographics, stroke subtype, severity, and clinical outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test to examine associations between variables, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results:
Out of 445 stroke patients, 320 (71.9%) had dysphagia. Dysphagia was more common in hemorrhagic stroke patients than in ischemic stroke patients when incidence was evaluated within stroke categories (79.7% vs. 68.6%, p<0.001). Dysphagia was significantly predicted by severe stroke with poorer GCS scores (p<0.001). Patients with dysphagia had considerably greater incidence of pneumonia (59.4% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001) than patients without dysphagia. Conclusion: Post-stroke dysphagia is a common outcome of hemorrhagic stroke and stroke severity. It significantly increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia and adverse clinical consequences. Early dysphagia assessment and treatment are necessary to improve the results for stroke patients.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability worldwide and represents a major public health concern. Neurological deficits following stroke often lead to a variety of complications that can significantly affect patient recovery and quality of life. Among these complications, dysphagia, or difficulty in swallowing, is one of the most common and clinically significant conditions observed in stroke patients (1).

 

Post-stroke dysphagia occurs as a result of neurological impairment affecting the complex coordination of the swallowing mechanism. Damage to cortical, subcortical, or brainstem regions that regulate swallowing can disrupt the normal process of food and liquid passage from the mouth to the oesophagus. As a result, patients may experience difficulty in swallowing, choking, or aspiration (2).

 

This condition is of particular clinical concern because it increases the risk of several serious complications, including aspiration, malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. Among these, aspiration pneumonia is one of the most severe outcomes and is associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality rates (3).

 

Several factors have been identified as potential predictors of post-stroke dysphagia, including stroke severity, brainstem involvement, advanced age, hemorrhagic stroke, and reduced level of consciousness (4). Despite its significant impact on patient outcomes, dysphagia often remains under-recognized in clinical practice. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes associated with post-stroke dysphagia in patients admitted with acute stroke.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study Design Cross-sectional descriptive study. Study Population Patients admitted with acute stroke to a tertiary care hospital (Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar) over a period of 1 year from January 2025 to December 2025 Sample Size 445 patients. Inclusion Criteria • Patients aged ≥18 years • Confirmed diagnosis of stroke (ischemic or haemorrhagic) by CT or MRI • Admission within 48 hours of stroke onset Exclusion Criteria • Pre-existing swallowing disorders • Neurodegenerative diseases affecting swallowing • Previous head and neck surgery • Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <12 or those unable to follow simple verbal commands were excluded, as patients need to be sufficiently alert and able to comply with examiner instructions during dysphagia screening. Dysphagia was identified using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) screening tool. All stroke patients underwent systematic dysphagia screening using GUSS, without confirmatory instrumental evaluation (such as video fluoroscopic swallowing study). During hospitalization, patients were evaluated daily for clinical signs suggestive of pneumonia by the treating physician. Whenever pneumonia was suspected, appropriate diagnostic investigations and treatment were initiated. After discharge, patients were followed for up to three months through telephone contact and in-person visits. Information was collected regarding oral feeding status, removal of the nasogastric tube, symptoms of aspiration, clinical features suggestive of pneumonia, hospital readmission, and mortality. Death was considered pneumonia-related when fever, cough, and respiratory distress were present at the time of death. Demographic details, clinical examination findings, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and GCS scores were obtained directly from the patients. Statistical Analysis Software for statistical analysis was used. Frequencies and percentages were used to represent categorical variables. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between the variables. A significance level of p <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

Table 1: Clinico-demographic details of study participants (n = 445)

Parameter

Category

Number (n)

Percentage (%)

p-value

Age Group (years)

<50

78

17.5%

0.04

 

50–65

156

35.1%

 

 

>65

211

47.4%

 

Gender

Male

268

60.2%

0.12

 

Female

177

39.8%

 

Type of Stroke

Ischemic

312

70.1%

<0.01

 

Haemorrhagic

133

29.9%

 

GCS

15/15

100

22.4%

0.06

 

14/15

110

24.7%

0.04

 

13/15

119

26.7%

0.02

 

12/15

116

26%

<0.01

Stroke location

Right hemisphere

130

29.2%

0.03

 

Left hemisphere

142

31.9%

 

 

Bilateral

66

14.8%

 

 

Brainstem

107

24%

 

H/o previous stroke

Yes

138

31.0%

0.02

 

No

307

69.0%

 

Severity of dysphagia

No

125

28.1%

 

 

Mild

135

30.3%

<0.001

 

Moderate

105

23.6%

 

 

Severe

80

18.0%

 

Time of Onset

Within 24 hours

276

62.0%

0.03

 

After 24 hours

169

38.0%

 

Risk Factors

Hypertension

298

67.0%

0.02

 

Diabetes Mellitus

221

49.7%

0.01

 

Smoking

164

36.8%

0.03

 

Alcohol Use

121

27.2%

0.08

 

CAD

92

20.6%

0.04

 

Dyslipidaemia

150

33.7%

0.02

Complications

Aspiration Pneumonia

190

42.7%

<0.001

 

Malnutrition

138

31.0%

 

Outcome (assessed at 3 months post-stroke)

Improved

376

84.5%

<0.001

 

Persistent Dysphagia

121

27.2%

0.02

 

Mortality

69

15.5%

0.01

 

Recurrent hospitalization

41

9.2%

0.04

                     

 

Table 2: Impact of Dysphagia on Pneumonia

Dysphagia

Pneumonia

No Pneumonia

Total

p value

Present

190

130

320

 

Absent

45

80

125

 

Total

235

210

445

<0.001

 

Figure 1: Incidence of Dysphagia by Stroke Type

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: Impact of Dysphagia on Pneumonia

 

 

Table 3: Clinical Outcomes According to Post-Stroke Dysphagia Status at 3-Month Follow-up (n = 445)

Outcomes

Dysphagia Yes (n=320)

Dysphagia No (n=125)

Total (n=445)

p-value

Discharged Alive

259

117

376

0.0015

Death

61

8

69

0.0015

Pneumonia

190

45

235

<0.001

No Pneumonia

130

80

210

<0.001

Favourable Outcome (mRS 0–1)

102

86

188

<0.001

Functional Independence (mRS 0–2)

156

100

256

<0.001

Unfavourable Outcome (mRS 3–6)

164

25

189

<0.001

Persistent Dysphagia at 3 Months

121

0

121

NA

Recurrent Hospitalization

34

7

41

0.143

Mean Hospital Stay (days)

8.6 ± 3.2

5.1 ± 2.4

 

<0.001

 

Table 4: Predictors of Post-Stroke Dysphagia (Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, n = 445)

Variables

Category

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p-value

Age

>65 years

2.18

1.34 – 3.56

0.002

GCS

≤13

4.72

2.81 – 7.94

<0.001

Location of Stroke

Unilateral

1.00

NA

NA

 

Bilateral

2.64

1.41 – 4.96

0.003

 

Brainstem

5.18

2.76 – 9.74

<0.001

Risk Factors

Hypertension

1.92

1.14 – 3.24

0.014

 

Diabetes Mellitus

1.46

0.89 – 2.39

0.118

 

Smoking

1.78

1.05 – 3.02

0.031

 

Alcohol Use

1.39

0.79 – 2.46

0.221

 

CAD

1.84

1.01 – 3.35

0.046

 

Dyslipidaemia

1.69

1.00 – 2.86

0.049

DISCUSSION

The present study evaluated the prevalence, predictors, and clinical consequences of post-stroke dysphagia in 445 acute stroke patients and demonstrated a strong association between dysphagia and adverse short-term outcomes. Post-stroke dysphagia was identified in 320 patients (71.9%), confirming that swallowing dysfunction is a frequent neurological complication after stroke and an important contributor to morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and healthcare burden. A large proportion of the study population was elderly, with 47.4% aged above 65 years. Advanced age was significantly associated with dysphagia, which may be explained by age-related decline in neuromuscular coordination, delayed swallowing reflexes, and reduced physiological reserve. Although males constituted 60.2% of the cohort, gender was not a statistically significant predictor, in agreement with previous studies. (5).

 

Ischemic stroke was the most common subtype (70.1%); however, when incidence was assessed within stroke categories, dysphagia was more frequent in hemorrhagic stroke than ischemic stroke (79.7% vs 68.6%, p<0.001). Hemorrhagic stroke may produce larger lesions, cerebral edema, impaired consciousness, and more severe neurological deficits, thereby increasing swallowing dysfunction. Lower GCS scores were also strongly associated with dysphagia, emphasizing the relationship between reduced sensorium and impaired airway protection. Stroke location played an important role. Patients with bilateral hemispheric and brainstem lesions had significantly higher dysphagia rates. This finding is biologically plausible because the swallowing network depends on bilateral cortical input and intact brainstem nuclei coordinating pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing. Damage to these regions often results in severe or prolonged dysphagia. (6).

 

The severity of dysphagia also influenced outcomes. Moderate to severe dysphagia accounted for a substantial proportion of cases, highlighting the need for early bedside swallowing assessment and specialist referral. Most patients developed dysphagia within 24 hours of stroke onset, reinforcing the importance of routine early screening in acute stroke units. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, coronary artery disease, and dyslipidaemia were more common among dysphagic patients, suggesting that chronic vascular disease may predispose to more severe cerebrovascular injury and poorer neurological recovery. Feeding requirements reflected clinical burden, with only 55.1% managed by oral feeding, while 36% required nasogastric tube support. (7).

 

A major finding was the strong association between dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia. Based on comparative analysis, pneumonia occurred significantly more often in dysphagic patients than non-dysphagic patients (59.4% vs 36.0%, p<0.001). Dysphagia was also linked with malnutrition, recurrent hospitalization, higher mortality, and poorer functional outcomes at 3 months. Favorable recovery was substantially lower among patients with dysphagia. Overall, 60.2% of patients improved, 27.2% had persistent dysphagia, and mortality remained considerable. These findings underscore that post-stroke dysphagia is not merely a transient symptom but a clinically significant predictor of worse prognosis. Early screening, multidisciplinary swallowing rehabilitation, nutritional optimization, and aspiration prevention strategies are essential to improve survival and functional recovery after stroke. (8).

CONCLUSION

A common consequence that affects almost one-third of stroke patients is post-stroke dysphagia. To lower complications and enhance clinical results, all stroke patients should have routine early screening and proper dysphagia care. Hemorrhagic stroke and severe stroke are strong predictors of dysphagia. Dysphagia significantly increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia and unfavorable A common consequence that affects almost one-third of stroke patients is post-stroke dysphagia. To lower complications and enhance clinical results, all stroke patients should have routine early screening and proper dysphagia care. Hemorrhagic stroke and severe stroke are strong predictors of dysphagia. Dysphagia significantly increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia and unfavorable clinical outcomes.

REFERENCES
  1. Wang Z. Post-stroke dysphagia : identifying the evidence missing. Front Med. 2025;12(1494645):1–8.
  2. Said R, Mamari A, Lazarus ER, Harrasi M Al, Noumani H Al, Zaabi O Al. Prevalence, severity, and predictors of dysphagia among patients with acute stroke in Oman. J Educ Health Promot. 2024;13(September):1–9.
  3. Wenjing Song, Minmin Wu, Haoran Wang, Ruifeng Pang LZ. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of dysphagia after stroke : a systematic review and. Front Neurol. 2024;15(1403610):1–12.
  4. Karisik A, Moelgg K, Buergi L, Scherer L, Dejakum B, Felicetti S, et al. Impact of dysphagia on early psychosocial consequences after acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2025;476(June):123624.
  5. Khedr EM, Abbass MA, Soliman RK, Zaki AF, Gamea A. Post-stroke dysphagia : frequency , risk factors , and topographic representation : hospital-based study. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2021;57(23):1–8.
  6. Arnold M, Liesirova K, Broeg-morvay A, Meisterernst J. Dysphagia in Acute Stroke : Incidence , Burden and Impact on Clinical Outcome. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):1–11.
  7. Cohen DL, Roffe C, Beavan J, Blackett B, Fairfield CA, Hamdy S, et al. Post-stroke dysphagia : A review and design considerations for future trials. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):399–411.
  8. Netto PD, Rumbach A, Dunn K, Finch E. Clinical Predictors of Dysphagia Recovery After Stroke : A Systematic Review. Dysphagia [Internet]. 2023;38(1):1–22.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Association Between Cognitive Impairment, Frailty Index, and Rapid Renal Function Decline in Aging Individuals: A Retrospective Study
Published: 28/12/2025
Research Article
Enhancing Prosthetic Outcomes through Surgical and Periodontal Tissue Optimization: An Integrated Approach
...
Published: 30/03/2026
Research Article
Pattern of Antihypertensive Drug Use and Blood Pressure Control among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Hospital-Based Observational Study
Published: 22/05/2026
Research Article
Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Vitamin D Deficiency among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Attending a General Medicine Outpatient Department: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Published: 16/03/2026
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine